CRAC Bilingual Manual › Part: Radio System Fundamentals
CRAC Bilingual Exam Manual (Class A / B / C) | 中国业余无线电台操作技术能力验证英中对照手册
This section covers Antenna Systems and Matching with 42 bilingual questions from the CRAC 2025 question bank. Each question shows the original Chinese (left) and the English translation (right). The correct answer is highlighted in green, followed by a Knowledge Point Analysis and Candidate Tips covering US–China differences, common pitfalls, and real on-air practice.
Class badges ABC indicate which license-class syllabus includes each question. Class A is the entry level, Class B adds HF privileges, and Class C is the advanced level.
由半波长偶极天线和传输线构成的天线系统的理想工作状态应当是:
- A天线上只有驻波,馈线上只有行波
- B天线上只有行波,馈线上只有驻波
- C天线和馈线上都只有驻波
- D天线和馈线上都只有行波
The ideal operating state of an antenna system composed of a half-wave dipole and a transmission line should be:
- Astanding waves only on the antenna, traveling waves only on the feed line.
- Btraveling waves only on the antenna, standing waves only on the feed line.
- Cstanding waves only on both the antenna and the feed line.
- Dtraveling waves only on both the antenna and the feed line.
A resonant half-wave dipole has voltage/current standing waves along its elements (that’s normal for a radiator). The feed line, when matched to the dipole’s impedance, carries a traveling wave with no reflected power (A). Standing waves on the feed line (B/C) indicate a mismatch; pure traveling waves on the antenna (B/D) would mean no resonance.
US–China difference: Same antenna theory; US hams aim for a matched feed line (low SWR) while the antenna itself naturally has standing waves.
Common pitfall: Thinking standing waves on the feed line are desirable — they mean SWR > 1.
Real on-air practice: Your dipole shows a 1.2:1 SWR on the coax (traveling wave) yet has visible current nodes on the elements.
天线振子的端点效应、信号的相移等因素影响电磁波沿振子传播的速度。修整天线时,我们应考虑振子的实际长度会因此略短于计算值。这就是所谓的”缩短系数”。其经验值为:
- A0.95
- B1.05
- C0.707
- D1.414
The end effect of antenna elements, phase shift of signals, etc., affect the speed of electromagnetic wave propagation along the element. When trimming the antenna, we should consider that the actual element length will therefore be slightly shorter than the calculated value. This is the so-called “shortening factor”. Its empirical value is:
- A0.95
- B1.05
- C0.707
- D1.414
The shortening factor (缩短系数) accounts for end effects that make a practical dipole slightly shorter than the free-space half-wave length. Its empirical value is about 0.95 (A) — i.e., you multiply the ideal length by 0.95. Values 1.05 (B), 0.707 (C), 1.414 (D) are unrelated here.
US–China difference: US antenna books also cite ~0.95 (or 0.96) as the dipole shortening factor.
Common pitfall: Using 0.707 (the 1/√2 often seen in filter/transformer math) by mistake.
Real on-air practice: You cut a 20 m dipole a touch short, then lengthen to resonance with an analyzer.
制作工作频率为f(单位:兆赫)的半波长偶极天线。每边振子的长度(单位:米)约为:
- A71.3/f
- B48.8/f
- C142.6/f
- D150/f
To make a half-wave dipole antenna operating at frequency f (in MHz). The length of each element arm (in meters) is approximately:
- A71.3 / f
- B48.8 / f
- C142.6 / f
- D150 / f
Each arm of a half-wave dipole is a quarter wavelength. With λ = 300/f (m) and the ~0.95 shortening factor, one arm ≈ (300/f)/4 × 0.95 ≈ 71.3/f meters (A). 48.8/f (B) is the 1/4-wave-in-coax length (with velocity factor); 142.6/f (C) is the full dipole; 150/f (D) is the free-space full wavelength.
US–China difference: US hams use the same “234/f (ft)” per arm, equivalent to ~71.3/f (m).
Common pitfall: Using the full-dipole formula (143/f) for one arm and ending up twice as long.
Real on-air practice: A 14 MHz dipole: each arm ≈ 71.3/14 ≈ 5.1 m.
电波在介质中的传播速度低于光速,其与光速的比值称为”速度因子”,是介电常数平方根的倒数。聚乙烯介质同轴电缆我们最为常用。其速度因子约为:
- A0.65
- B1.54
- C1.95
- D1.0006
The propagation speed of radio waves in a medium is lower than the speed of light; its ratio to the speed of light is called the “velocity factor”, the reciprocal of the square root of the dielectric constant. Polyethylene dielectric coaxial cable is the most commonly used. Its velocity factor is approximately:
- A0.65
- B1.54
- C1.95
- D1.0006
Velocity factor = 1/√(εr) and is always ≤ 1. Solid polyethylene has εr ≈ 2.3, giving VF ≈ 0.66; the question’s accepted value is about 0.65 (A). Values above 1 (B, C) are impossible for a passive dielectric, and 1.0006 (D) is essentially air.
US–China difference: US hams use the same polyethylene VF ≈ 0.66 when cutting coax stubs.
Common pitfall: Forgetting VF is ≤ 1 and picking a value > 1.
Real on-air practice: A 1/4-wave 2 m stub in RG-213 must be cut using 0.66, not the free-space length.
制作工作频率为f(单位:兆赫兹)的某相控天线阵列需要长度为1/4波长的同轴电缆,大致长度(单位:米)应当为:
- A48.8/f
- B149.8/f
- C75/f
- D71.3/f
To build a certain phased antenna array operating at frequency f (in MHz), a coaxial cable of 1/4 wavelength is needed; its approximate length (in meters) should be:
- A48.8 / f
- B149.8 / f
- C75 / f
- D71.3 / f
Quarter wavelength in coax = (75/f) × velocity factor. For solid polyethylene VF ≈ 0.65, that is 75 × 0.65 / f ≈ 48.8/f meters (A). 75/f (C) is the free-space quarter wave; 71.3/f (D) is a dipole arm; 149.8/f (B) is a half wave in coax. The coax quarter-wave with VF gives 48.8/f.
US–China difference: US phased-array/phasing-line calculations use the same VF-adjusted 1/4-wave length.
Common pitfall: Forgetting to multiply by the cable’s velocity factor and using 75/f.
Real on-air practice: A 1/4-wave phasing line for a 2 m antenna array is cut to ~48.8/144 ≈ 0.34 m of coax.
如需偶极天线谐振于工作频率之时具有低输入阻抗,振子的总长度可以是:
- A1/2波长的奇数倍
- B1/2波长的整数倍
- C1/2波长的偶数倍
- D1/4波长的奇数倍
If a dipole antenna is to have low input impedance when resonant at the operating frequency, the total length of the elements can be:
- Aan odd multiple of 1/2 wavelength.
- Ban integer multiple of 1/2 wavelength.
- Can even multiple of 1/2 wavelength.
- Dan odd multiple of 1/4 wavelength.
A center-fed dipole has a low feed-point impedance at resonance when its total length is an odd multiple of λ/2 (λ/2, 3λ/2, …) (A). At even multiples (full wavelengths, λ, 2λ) the center becomes a current node and the impedance is very high (C is wrong). Option B includes even multiples, so it is not specifically “low impedance”.
US–China difference: Same dipole impedance-vs-length relationship taught in US antenna theory.
Common pitfall: Thinking any half-wave multiple gives low impedance — only the odd multiples do at center feed.
Real on-air practice: A 3λ/2 dipole still presents ~50–75 Ω at the center, while a 1λ loop-like dipole would be a high-impedance point.
偶极天线谐振于所需工作频率的充分和必要条件是:
- A两臂总电气长度为1/2工作波长的整数倍
- B两臂总电气长度为1/4工作波长的整数倍
- C两臂总电气长度为1/2工作波长的奇数倍
- D两臂总电气长度为工作波长的整数倍
The necessary and sufficient condition for a dipole antenna to resonate at the desired operating frequency is:
- Athe total electrical length of both arms is an integer multiple of 1/2 of the operating wavelength.
- Bthe total electrical length of both arms is an integer multiple of 1/4 of the operating wavelength.
- Cthe total electrical length of both arms is an odd multiple of 1/2 of the operating wavelength.
- Dthe total electrical length of both arms is an integer multiple of the operating wavelength.
A dipole resonates whenever its total (both arms) electrical length equals n·λ/2 (n = 1, 2, 3, …) — this covers half-wave, full-wave, 3/2-wave, etc. (A). Restricting to odd multiples only (C) or to whole wavelengths (D) is too narrow; 1/4 multiples (B) describes a monopole over ground, not a dipole.
US–China difference: Identical resonance condition in US antenna references.
Common pitfall: Limiting “resonant dipole” to only the half-wave case and missing the higher-order resonances.
Real on-air practice: A 40 m dipole can also resonate on 15 m (3rd harmonic, total length = 3λ/2).
下列哪种谐振偶极天线在垂直于振子的方向上具有峰值增益:
- A振子长度为1/2工作波长
- B振子长度为1/8个工作波长
- C振子长度为1/4工作波长
- D振子长度为3/2工作波长
Which of the following resonant dipole antennas has peak gain in the direction perpendicular to the element?
- Aelement length is 1/2 operating wavelength
- Belement length is 1/8 operating wavelength
- Celement length is 1/4 operating wavelength
- Delement length is 3/2 operating wavelength
A half-wave dipole (element = λ/2) radiates maximum field broadside — perpendicular to the element (A). A full-wave (λ, =2 half-waves) dipole develops a figure-8 with nulls broadside and peaks off the ends; the 3/2-wave (D) is also end-fired/lobed, not broadside-peaked. 1/8 and 1/4 wavelengths (B, C) are electrically short and inefficient, with no clean broadside peak.
US–China difference: Same radiation pattern fundamentals; US hams rely on the half-wave dipole’s broadside pattern.
Common pitfall: Assuming all dipoles radiate broadside — only the half-wave (and odd multiples) do cleanly.
Real on-air practice: A horizontal half-wave dipole gives you best signal to stations broadside (perpendicular) to the wire.
提高偶极天线谐振频率的方法是:
- A将振子截短一些
- B在振子某处串联线圈
- C将振子加长一些
- D为振子添加”X”形电容帽
The method to raise a dipole antenna’s resonant frequency is:
- Ashorten the elements a bit.
- Bseries-connect a coil somewhere on the element.
- Clengthen the elements a bit.
- Dadd an “X”-shaped capacitance hat to the element.
Resonant frequency is inversely proportional to electrical length. Shortening the elements lowers the electrical length and raises the resonant frequency (A). Lengthening (C) lowers it; adding a loading coil (B) or capacitance hat (D) adds electrical length and lowers the frequency.
US–China difference: US hams trim antenna length the same way to move resonance up.
Common pitfall: Adding a coil thinking it raises frequency — coils are electrical lengthening (lower freq).
Real on-air practice: Your 40 m dipole resonates low; you snip an inch off each end to move it to 7.050 MHz.
在天线和馈线之间常会接入一个俗称”巴伦(BALUN)”的部件。”巴伦”的由来是:
- A平衡与不平衡两个英文字头的组合
- B发明平衡-不平衡转换器的人的名字
- C著名天线阻抗匹配理论家的名字
- D大牌宽带匹配网络的制造商名字
Between the antenna and feed line a component commonly called a “balun” is often inserted. The origin of “balun” is:
- Aa combination of the initial letters of “balanced” and “unbalanced”.
- Bthe name of the person who invented the balanced-unbalanced converter.
- Cthe name of a famous antenna impedance-matching theorist.
- Dthe name of a major broadband matching-network manufacturer.
“Balun” is a portmanteau of BALanced and UNbalanced (A). It is not a person’s name (B, C) or a brand (D).
US–China difference: Same etymology in US literature.
Common pitfall: Treating “balun” as a proprietary product name.
Real on-air practice: You say “I need a 1:1 balun for my dipole” — the word just means balanced/unbalanced conversion.
在天线和馈线之间常会接入一个俗称”巴伦(BALUN)”的部件。它的主要功能是:
- A在平衡电路和不平衡电路之间传递射频能量,阻断两者之间的任何寄生耦合
- B实现天线和馈线之间的自动阻抗匹配
- C展宽天线的工作频带
- D降低天线的驻波比
Between the antenna and feed line a component commonly called a “balun” is often inserted. Its main function is:
- Ato transfer RF energy between a balanced circuit and an unbalanced circuit, blocking any parasitic coupling between the two.
- Bto achieve automatic impedance matching between the antenna and the feed line.
- Cto broaden the antenna’s operating bandwidth.
- Dto lower the antenna’s standing-wave ratio.
A balun’s job is to interface a balanced load (e.g., a dipole, both legs symmetric) with an unbalanced line (coax, one conductor grounded), transferring RF while choking common-mode/parasitic currents (A). It is not primarily an automatic matcher (B), bandwidth extender (C), or SWR reducer per se (D) — though a proper balun can improve the measured SWR by eliminating feed-line radiation.
US–China difference: US hams use baluns for the identical balanced/unbalanced role; impedance transformation (4:1, etc.) is a secondary function of some balun types.
Common pitfall: Assuming a balun automatically fixes a high SWR — it won’t if the antenna itself is mismatched.
Real on-air practice: A 1:1 current balun at the dipole feed stops RF from flowing on the coax shield.
一副两臂电气长度各为1/4波长的偶极天线,断开中点,通过巴伦馈电,测得谐振频率为f,输入阻抗为Z。如果总长不变,但是将断开的馈电点向一侧偏移1/8波长,则天线特性的最明显变化是:
- A阻抗Z显著变大,相比之下谐振频率f变化不大
- B阻抗Z显著变小,相比之下谐振频率f变化不大
- C谐振频率f显著升高,相比之下阻抗Z变化不大
- D谐振频率f显著下降,相比之下阻抗Z变化不大
A dipole whose two arms each have an electrical length of 1/4 wavelength, with the center broken and fed via a balun, measures resonant frequency f and input impedance Z. If the total length is unchanged but the break/feed point is shifted 1/8 wavelength to one side, the most obvious change in the antenna’s characteristics is:
- Aimpedance Z increases significantly, while the resonant frequency f changes little.
- Bimpedance Z decreases significantly, while the resonant frequency f changes little.
- Cthe resonant frequency f rises significantly, while the impedance Z changes little.
- Dthe resonant frequency f drops significantly, while the impedance Z changes little.
Moving the feed point away from the current antinode (center) toward a higher-current region reduces the symmetry and places the feed at a point of lower current / higher voltage, so the input impedance rises sharply (A). Total length is unchanged, so the resonance frequency f stays about the same. This is the principle behind “off-center-fed” (OCF) dipoles, which present a higher, often usable impedance.
US–China difference: US hams exploit the same effect in OCF (“Windom”) dipoles for multi-band high-Z feed.
Common pitfall: Expecting the resonance to shift a lot when only the feed point moves; length, not feed position, sets resonance.
Real on-air practice: An off-center-fed dipole fed at ~1/3 point shows a few-hundred-ohm impedance usable with a 4:1 balun.
南北走向的水平极化偶极天线,中点馈电,通过特性阻抗为50欧的电缆连接到输入/输出阻抗为50欧的收发信机,通信对象在东西方向。选择天线长度的原则是:
- A当振子两臂各为四分之一波长时,通信效果是最好的
- B当振子两臂各为二分之一波长时,通信效果是最好的
- C当振子两臂各为四分之三波长时,通信效果是最好的
- D驻波比接近1:1时通信效果才会最好,无关振子长度
A horizontally polarized dipole oriented north–south, center-fed, connected via 50-ohm cable to a 50-ohm transceiver, with the correspondent to the east–west. The principle for choosing antenna length is:
- Awhen each arm is a quarter wavelength, the communication effect is best.
- Bwhen each arm is a half wavelength, the communication effect is best.
- Cwhen each arm is three-quarters of a wavelength, the communication effect is best.
- Dthe communication effect is best only when the SWR is close to 1:1, regardless of element length.
A horizontal dipole’s maximum radiation is broadside (perpendicular) to the wire. North–south orientation puts the broadside lobes toward east–west — exactly where the correspondent is. The standard broadside-maximum case is the half-wave dipole, i.e., each arm = λ/4 (A). Each arm = λ/2 (B) would make a full-wave dipole with end-fire/null-broadside pattern, poor toward east–west. The reference answer marks A.
US–China difference: Same orientation/pattern reasoning used by US hams for NVIS and directional work.
Common pitfall: Thinking longer is better; a full-wave dipole’s broadside is actually a null.
Real on-air practice: Orient your 20 m dipole N–S to work Europe (east–west) with maximum strength.
短波水平偶极类天线(含八木天线等)的发射仰角主要由下列因素决定:
- A由天线的辐射和大地的反射叠加而成。天线距地面的高度与波长的比值影响仰角
- B由天线振子导体所指的方向决定
- C由八木天线主梁所指的方向决定
- D由天线振子的长度所决定
The launch (takeoff) angle of short-wave horizontal dipole antennas (including Yagi, etc.) is mainly determined by:
- Ait is formed by the superposition of the antenna’s radiation and the ground reflection. The ratio of the antenna’s height above ground to the wavelength affects the angle.
- Bit is determined by the direction the antenna element conductor points.
- Cit is determined by the direction the Yagi’s boom points.
- Dit is determined by the length of the antenna element.
The launch angle of a horizontal antenna is set by the interference pattern between the direct wave and its image reflected from the ground; the key variable is height above ground expressed in wavelengths (A). Element pointing direction (B), boom direction (C), and element length (D) affect azimuth/pattern/gain, not primarily the elevation angle.
US–China difference: US antenna modeling (EZNEC, etc.) shows the same height/λ control of takeoff angle.
Common pitfall: Blaming element length for elevation; length sets resonance, height sets angle.
Real on-air practice: Raising a dipole from λ/4 to λ/2 above ground pushes the main lobe lower for long-haul DX.
架设短波天线时,应大致按照如下原则选择天线的发射仰角:
- A远距离通信选择低发射仰角,近距离通信选择高发射仰角
- B近距离通信选择低发射仰角,远距离通信选择高发射仰角
- C近处开阔时选择低发射仰角,近处有建筑物时选择高发射仰角
- D较低频率通信选择低发射仰角,较高频率通信选择高发射仰角
When erecting a short-wave antenna, the launch angle should roughly be chosen according to:
- Afor long-distance communication choose a low launch angle; for short-distance communication choose a high launch angle.
- Bfor short-distance communication choose a low launch angle; for long-distance communication choose a high launch angle.
- Cchoose a low launch angle when the surroundings are open, and a high launch angle when there are buildings nearby.
- Dchoose a low launch angle for lower-frequency communication and a high launch angle for higher-frequency communication.
Long-distance (DX) contacts rely on one or more ionospheric hops, which need a low launch angle to reach far; short-distance (near-vertical-incidence, NVIS) contacts need a high launch angle to return to ground nearby (A). B is reversed; C/D are not the governing principles.
US–China difference: US hams follow the same rule; NVIS (high angle) is standard for 80/160 m regional comms.
Common pitfall: Reversing the angle for distance — high angle is for nearby, low angle for far.
Real on-air practice: For a 300 km emergency net you want NVIS (high angle); for Europe from China you want a low-angle beam.
架设短波天线时,应大致按照如下原则规划天线的架设高度:
- A远距离通信选择较高的高度,近距离通信选择较低的高度
- B远距离通信选择较低的高度,近距离通信选择较高的高度
- C近处有建筑物时选择较低的高度,近处开阔时选择较高的高度
- D较低频率通信选择较高的高度,较高频率通信选择较低的高度
When erecting a short-wave antenna, the antenna height should roughly be planned according to:
- Afor long-distance communication choose a greater height; for short-distance communication choose a lower height.
- Bfor long-distance communication choose a lower height; for short-distance communication choose a greater height.
- Cchoose a lower height when there are buildings nearby, and a greater height when the surroundings are open.
- Dchoose a greater height for lower-frequency communication and a lower height for higher-frequency communication.
Since launch angle depends on height in wavelengths, a greater absolute height (more wavelengths) yields a lower angle suited to DX, while a lower height gives a higher angle for nearby work (A). B is reversed; C/D are not the primary planning rule (though higher frequencies need more wavelengths to reach the same angle, the stated principle links height to distance).
US–China difference: US hams also raise HF antennas (e.g., 60–120 ft towers) for low-angle DX.
Common pitfall: Reversing height vs. distance relationship.
Real on-air practice: A DX-minded 20 m station hunts for the tallest tower/mast it can erect.
在针对特定对象的DX通信中,计算天线最佳发射仰角的基本方法是:
- A根据所使用电离层的大致高度、通信对象的大致距离、电波在传播中经历电离层反射的次数,用简单几何方法计算
- B根据通信对象所在的方位、地球半径、对方天线的高度、实际工作频率、太阳平均黑子数,查表计算
- C根据通信对象所在的方位、通信方向上障碍物所遮挡的仰角、本台周围的大地电导率、实际工作频率,找公式计算
- D根据通信双方的发射功率、天线极化、通信方向上障碍物所遮挡的仰角、太阳10.7 cm射电通量,找公式计算
In DX communication aimed at a specific target, the basic method to calculate the antenna’s optimal launch angle is:
- Abased on the approximate height of the ionosphere used, the approximate distance to the correspondent, and the number of ionospheric reflections the wave undergoes during propagation, calculate by simple geometric methods.
- Bbased on the correspondent’s azimuth, Earth’s radius, the other station’s antenna height, the actual operating frequency, and the average sunspot number, calculate by table lookup.
- Cbased on the correspondent’s azimuth, the elevation angle blocked by obstacles in the communication direction, the ground conductivity around your station, and the actual operating frequency, find a formula to calculate.
- Dbased on both stations’ transmit power, antenna polarization, the elevation angle blocked by obstacles in the communication direction, and the solar 10.7 cm radio flux, find a formula to calculate.
The optimal launch angle for a point-to-point DX path is found geometrically from the ionosphere’s effective height, the path distance, and the number of hops — a simple triangle/geometry computation (A). Power (D), sunspot number (B), or ground conductivity/obstacles (C) are secondary or irrelevant to the basic angle geometry.
US–China difference: US propagation tools (VOACAP, DXAtlas) compute the same takeoff angle from path geometry and ionospheric models.
Common pitfall: Thinking transmit power or sunspot number sets the angle — they affect reliability, not the geometric optimum.
Real on-air practice: You check that your beam’s main lobe launches at ~10° to hit Europe via a single F-layer hop.
收发信天线周边大地电导率对HF远距离通信的影响大致为:
- A大地电导率越高,大地的镜像作用越理想,天线的效果越好
- B大地电导率越低,大地中的感生电流越弱,天线的效果越好
- CHF远距离通信依靠天波反射,与大地电导率无关
- D大地电导率太高、太低都不好,最好是处于中间值
The effect of ground conductivity around the transmitting/receiving antenna on long-distance HF communication is roughly:
- AThe higher the ground conductivity, the more ideal the earth’s image (mirror) effect, and the better the antenna’s performance
- BThe lower the ground conductivity, the weaker the induced current in the earth, and the better the antenna’s performance
- CLong-distance HF communication relies on skywave reflection and is independent of ground conductivity
- DGround conductivity that is too high or too low is bad; an intermediate value is best
Ground conductivity affects the image (mirror) effect of the earth, which acts as a reflecting ground plane for the antenna. Higher ground conductivity gives a stronger, more ideal image current, improving low-angle radiation and hence long-distance (DX) HF performance — especially on the launch of the skywave (天波). Option B is wrong because lower conductivity weakens the image and worsens performance; C is wrong because ground conductivity at the launch point does affect skywave; D misstates the optimum.
US–China difference: Same physics in the US; good ground (salt water, wet soil) is known to improve low-band DX, while poor ground (dry sand, rock) hurts it.
Common pitfall: Thinking HF DX depends only on the ionosphere and ignoring the ground’s image effect at the transmitting end.
Real on-air practice: On 80 m, a station over salt water or with a good radial system often works DX that a poor-ground station cannot.
如果将水平偶极天线的架高降低到距地面1/10波长处,其馈电点阻抗有什么变化?
- A下降
- B上升
- C电抗分量消失
- D电阻分量消失
If the height of a horizontal dipole antenna is lowered to 1/10 wavelength above ground, what change occurs in its feed-point impedance?
- AIt decreases
- BIt increases
- CThe reactive component disappears
- DThe resistive component disappears
When a horizontal dipole is brought very close to ground (1/10 λ), the antenna is no longer in free space; its image (mirror) current strongly couples to it, and the radiation resistance drops substantially. Thus the feed-point impedance (the resistive part) decreases. Options B, C and D are incorrect.
US–China difference: Same behavior; US antenna manuals warn that very low dipoles have low feed-point resistance and need careful matching.
Common pitfall: Assuming feed-point impedance stays at ~73 Ω regardless of height — it falls sharply near the ground.
Real on-air practice: A low NVIS dipole may show only 20–30 Ω at the feed point, needing a tuner or matching network.
在导电良好的地面上,影响短波天线辐射仰角的主要因素是:
- A天线距地面的高度与波长之比
- B天线的绝对高度,与波长无关
- C天线离海平面的绝对高度
- D天线振子或者八木天线主梁与地面之间的夹角
On a good conducting ground, the main factor affecting the radiation elevation angle of a short-wave (HF) antenna is:
- Athe ratio of the antenna’s height above ground to the wavelength
- Bthe antenna’s absolute height, independent of wavelength
- Cthe antenna’s absolute height above sea level
- Dthe angle between the antenna element (or the Yagi boom) and the ground
The radiation elevation angle (辐射仰角) is set by the phase relationship between the antenna and its ground image, which depends on height measured in wavelengths (height-to-wavelength ratio), not on absolute height. Option B (absolute height ignoring wavelength) and C (height above sea level) are therefore wrong; D confuses physical tilt with the elevation-angle mechanism.
US–China difference: Same principle; US hams also learn that a 1/2-λ-high dipole radiates at a low angle while a very low one radiates nearly straight up.
Common pitfall: Thinking a fixed absolute height (e.g., 10 m) gives the same angle on 10 m and 80 m bands — it does not, because the wavelength differs.
Real on-air practice: For low-angle DX on 20 m you want the dipole as high as possible in wavelengths; for NVIS on 80 m a low dipole is used.
自己架设HF偶极天线时,如果因空间限制而无法将振子展开到在工作频率下自然谐振所需的长度,则可将电感线圈串入振子某处或干脆将整个振子都做成线圈以制成某种“加感天线”并通过调整电感量来获取所需谐振频率。关于这种天线,以下描述正确的是:
- A通过迭代修整线圈的电感量及其串入振子的位置,我们肯定可以获得与某个全尺寸天线等效的谐振频率和馈电点阻抗。但是,这种加感天线的辐射效率比全尺寸天线低
- B无论是谐振频率、阻抗特性还是辐射效率,这种加感天线都不能媲美全尺寸天线
- C只要设计得当,制作精心,调试得法,这种加感天线的效果与全尺寸天线一样好
- D如果设计得当、制作精心、调试得法,这种加感天线的效果可以超越全尺寸天线
When building your own HF dipole, if space limits prevent spreading the element to its natural resonant length at the operating frequency, you can insert a loading coil somewhere in the element, or make the whole element a coil, to build a kind of inductively loaded antenna and tune the inductance to get the desired resonant frequency. Which of the following descriptions of this antenna is correct?
- ABy iteratively adjusting the coil’s inductance and its position in the element, you can certainly obtain a resonant frequency and feed-point impedance equivalent to those of a full-size antenna. However, the radiation efficiency of this loaded antenna is lower than that of the full-size antenna
- BWhether in resonant frequency, impedance, or radiation efficiency, this loaded antenna cannot match a full-size antenna
- CAs long as the design, construction, and adjustment are proper, such a loaded antenna performs as well as a full-size antenna
- DIf properly designed, constructed, and adjusted, such a loaded antenna can surpass a full-size antenna
An inductively loaded (加感) antenna can be tuned with a coil to resonance and to the same feed-point impedance as a full-size antenna, so B is too absolute. But the coil adds loss resistance and makes the current distribution less uniform, so radiation efficiency is always lower than a full-size element — C and D (equal or better than full-size) are false. A states both facts correctly.
US–China difference: US hams use the same loaded/shortened antennas (e.g., mobile HF whips) and accept lower efficiency for portability.
Common pitfall: Believing a good tuner makes a loaded antenna as efficient as a full-size one — matching is not efficiency.
Real on-air practice: A loaded 40 m dipole may tune fine but be several dB weaker than a full-size one on the air.
下图所示是我国业余无线电爱好者开展野外通信活动常用的14/21/29MHz三频段偶极天线。图中天线各段的电气长度应分别为:
- AA为28MHz的1/4波长,A+B为21MHz的1/4波长,A+B+C为14MHz的1/4波长
- BA为28MHz的半波长,A+B为21MHz的半波长,A+B+C为14MHz的半波长
- CA为28MHz的1/4波长,B为21MHz的1/4波长,C为14MHz的1/4波长
- DA为28MHz的半波长,B为21MHz的半波长,C为14MHz的半波长 [F]LK0941.jpg
The figure shows a 14/21/29 MHz triband dipole commonly used by Chinese amateur radio operators for field-communication activities. The electrical lengths of the antenna segments should respectively be:
- AA is 1/4 wavelength at 28 MHz, A+B is 1/4 wavelength at 21 MHz, and A+B+C is 1/4 wavelength at 14 MHz
- BA is 1/2 wavelength at 28 MHz, A+B is 1/2 wavelength at 21 MHz, and A+B+C is 1/2 wavelength at 14 MHz
- CA is 1/4 wavelength at 28 MHz, B is 1/4 wavelength at 21 MHz, and C is 1/4 wavelength at 14 MHz
- DA is 1/2 wavelength at 28 MHz, B is 1/2 wavelength at 21 MHz, and C is 1/2 wavelength at 14 MHz [F]LK0941.jpg
This is a trapped triband dipole: each added inner segment forms a 1/4-wavelength (plus the trap) section at the next lower band, so the cumulative lengths are A = 1/4 λ at 28 MHz, A+B = 1/4 λ at 21 MHz, A+B+C = 1/4 λ at 14 MHz. Option B (half-wave) and C/D (each segment its own band) are wrong.
US–China difference: Trapped dipoles are used by US hams in the same way for multi-band field work.
Common pitfall: Treating each segment as a separate 1/4-wave element (C) rather than cumulative lengths.
Real on-air practice: One trapped dipole fed with one cable works 14, 21 and 29 MHz on a field day.
下图所示是我国业余无线电爱好者开展野外通信活动常用的14/21/29MHz三频段偶极天线。图中部件A、B、C、D的作用分别为:
- AA、D为21MHz陷波器,B、C为28MHz陷波器,即,分别谐振于21MHz和28MHz的并联谐振回路
- BA、D为21MHz陷波器,B、C为28MHz陷波器,即,分别谐振于21MHz和28MHz的串联谐振回路
- CA、D为14MHz陷波器,B、C为21MHz陷波器,即,分别谐振于14MHz和21MHz的并联谐振回路
- DA、D为14MHz陷波器,B、C为21MHz陷波器,即,分别谐振于14MHz和21MHz的串联谐振回路 [F]LK0942.jpg
The figure shows the 14/21/29 MHz triband dipole commonly used by Chinese amateur radio operators for field communication. The functions of components A, B, C and D are respectively:
- AA and D are 21 MHz traps, B and C are 28 MHz traps — i.e., parallel-resonant circuits resonating at 21 MHz and 28 MHz respectively
- BA and D are 21 MHz traps, B and C are 28 MHz traps — i.e., series-resonant circuits resonating at 21 MHz and 28 MHz respectively
- CA and D are 14 MHz traps, B and C are 21 MHz traps — i.e., parallel-resonant circuits resonating at 14 MHz and 21 MHz respectively
- DA and D are 14 MHz traps, B and C are 21 MHz traps — i.e., series-resonant circuits resonating at 14 MHz and 21 MHz respectively [F]LK0942.jpg
A trap (陷波器) in a dipole is a parallel-resonant LC circuit that presents a high impedance at its trap frequency, isolating the outer sections so the antenna behaves as a shorter dipole on lower bands. Here A/D trap at 21 MHz and B/C at 28 MHz, and they are parallel-resonant. Options B and D wrongly call them series-resonant; C mislabels the trap frequencies.
US–China difference: US trapped antennas use the same parallel-resonant trap principle.
Common pitfall: Confusing series vs parallel resonance in a trap — a trap must be parallel (high Z) to block the outer section.
Real on-air practice: On 28 MHz the 21 MHz traps open the circuit at the trap, leaving only the outer section.
谐振偶极天线的振子长度最短也要半个波长。如果架设天线时因条件受限而不得不将振子缩短,那么在振子之中串入电感可以补偿失去的感抗,使天线谐振在所需频率下。为了提高发射效率,应在振子的什么位置串入电感需根据架设条件择优确定。下图给出三种加感方案。假设振子(灰色部分)均等长,则A、B、C三种方案按发射效率可排列为:
- AC-顶部加感,B-中部加感,A-底部加感
- BA-底部加感,B-中部加感,C-顶部加感
- CA-底部加感,C-顶部加感,B-中部加感
- DB-中部加感,A-底部加感,C-顶部加感 [F]LK0943.jpg
The element of a resonant dipole must be at least half a wavelength long. If erection space forces you to shorten the element, inserting inductance into the element compensates the lost reactance and resonates the antenna at the desired frequency. To raise transmit efficiency, the best coil position depends on the site. The figure shows three loading schemes. Assuming the (grey) elements are equal in length, the transmit efficiency ranking of schemes A, B and C is:
- AC = top loading, B = center loading, A = base loading
- BA = base loading, B = center loading, C = top loading
- CA = base loading, C = top loading, B = center loading
- DB = center loading, A = base loading, C = top loading [F]LK0943.jpg
Loading-coil efficiency is highest when the coil is placed where the antenna current is largest, keeping the current distribution most uniform. Top (C) and center (B) loading are far better than base (A) loading. So the order from best to worst is top (C) > center (B) > base (A), which is option A.
US–China difference: Same loading-order rule applies to US mobile HF antennas (center/top hat loading beats base loading).
Common pitfall: Assuming base loading (easiest to build) is most efficient — it is the least.
Real on-air practice: A center-loaded mobile whip radiates noticeably better than a base-loaded one of the same length.
对于需要频繁改换频段的业余无线电业务,爱好者们有时会将所用频段的偶极振子并联起来一同馈电,构成一种用一根电缆即可操作的多频段天线。下图给出了一副由7、14和28MHz半波长振子构成的多频段天线实例。关于其工作原理,以下分析正确的是:
- A7MHz振子以3/2波长方式工作于21MHz,该天线由此工作在7、14、21和28MHz四个频段。由于不谐振的振子呈现高阻抗,所以并联后的总阻抗仍为50欧左右
- B该天线工作于7、14和28MHz。由于不谐振的振子呈现高阻抗,所以并联后的总阻抗仍为50欧左右
- C7MHz振子以3/2波长方式工作于21MHz,该天线由此工作在7、14、21和28MHz四个频段。由于每个振子的阻抗都在50欧上下,所以并联后的总阻抗降至17欧左右
- D该天线工作于7、14和28MHz。由于每个振子的阻抗都在50欧上下,所以并联后的总阻抗降至17欧左右 [F]LK0945.jpg
For amateur services that must change bands frequently, operators sometimes parallel the dipoles of the used bands and feed them together, making a multi-band antenna operable with a single cable. The figure shows an example built from 7, 14 and 28 MHz half-wave elements. Which of the following analyses of its working principle is correct?
- AThe 7 MHz element operates as 3/2 wavelength at 21 MHz, so the antenna works on the 7, 14, 21 and 28 MHz bands. Because the non-resonant elements present high impedance, the total parallel impedance remains about 50 Ω
- BThe antenna works on 7, 14 and 28 MHz. Because the non-resonant elements present high impedance, the total parallel impedance remains about 50 Ω
- CThe 7 MHz element operates as 3/2 wavelength at 21 MHz, so the antenna works on the 7, 14, 21 and 28 MHz bands. Because each element’s impedance is about 50 Ω, the total parallel impedance drops to about 17 Ω
- DThe antenna works on 7, 14 and 28 MHz. Because each element’s impedance is about 50 Ω, the total parallel impedance drops to about 17 Ω [F]LK0945.jpg
A 7 MHz half-wave dipole is 3/2 λ long at 21 MHz (since λ21 = λ7/3), so it also resonates on 21 MHz, giving four usable bands (7, 14, 21, 28). On any one band the other elements are off-resonance and look like high impedance, so the parallel combination stays near 50 Ω — making A correct. C and D wrongly assume all elements are near 50 Ω and would parallel down to ~17 Ω.
US–China difference: The same parallel-dipole (fan dipole) trick is common in US multi-band stations.
Common pitfall: Forgetting the 7 MHz element also covers 21 MHz (harmonically), and assuming parallel 50 Ω elements drop to 17 Ω.
Real on-air practice: One feed line to a fan dipole gives you 7/14/21/28 MHz without a tuner.
什么是八木天线?
- A一种通过反射器和引向器来增强方向性的半波长偶极天线
- B任何一种可以汇聚无线电波的方向性天线的统称
- C八木秀次博士发明的一种全向天线
- D一种具有八根水平振子的中心馈电天线,也叫Octopus
What is a Yagi antenna (八木天线)?
- Aa half-wave dipole antenna that enhances directivity through a reflector and directors
- Ba general term for any directional antenna that can focus radio waves
- Can omnidirectional antenna invented by Dr. Hidetsugu Yagi
- Da center-fed antenna with eight horizontal elements, also called Octopus
A Yagi (八木天线) is a directional antenna made of a driven half-wave dipole plus a reflector behind it and one or more directors in front, which together increase gain and directivity. B is too broad (many directional antennas exist), C is wrong (it is directional, not omnidirectional), D is a made-up description.
US–China difference: The US uses identical Yagi-Uda antennas, e.g., on 2 m and for EME.
Common pitfall: Thinking a Yagi is omnidirectional or that the name comes from having eight elements.
Real on-air practice: A 3-element Yagi on your roof points at the station you want to work.
八木天线是在普通偶极天线(主振子)的基础上通过添加引向器和反射器而制成的一种定向天线。目视确定全尺寸八木天线发射方向的方法是:
- A比主振子短者为引向器,比主振子长者为反射器,引向器朝向最大辐射方向
- B比主振子长者为引向器,比主振子短者为反射器,引向器朝向最大辐射方向
- C比主振子短者为引向器,比主振子长者为反射器,反射器朝向最大辐射方向
- D主振子的轴向为最大辐射方向
A Yagi is a directional antenna made by adding directors and a reflector to a normal dipole (driven element). The visual method to determine the direction of maximum radiation of a full-size Yagi is:
- AThe element shorter than the driven element is the director, the longer one is the reflector, and the directors point toward the direction of maximum radiation
- BThe element longer than the driven element is the director, the shorter one is the reflector, and the directors point toward the direction of maximum radiation
- CThe element shorter than the driven element is the director, the longer one is the reflector, and the reflector points toward the direction of maximum radiation
- DThe axis of the driven element is the direction of maximum radiation
In a Yagi the directors are shorter than the driven element and the reflector is longer; the antenna radiates toward the directors (the shorter elements in front). So A is correct; B swaps director/reflector lengths, C points the beam at the reflector, and D ignores the directors.
US–China difference: Same identification rule used by US hams when aiming a beam.
Common pitfall: Pointing the beam at the long element (reflector) instead of the short directors.
Real on-air practice: Aim the short-element end of your Yagi at the DX station for strongest signal.
八木天线的“前后比”是如何定义的?
- A主瓣辐射功率与反向辐射功率之比
- B前向增益与理想点源天线增益之比
- C导向器与反射器的数量之比
- D导向器与驱动器的数量之比
How is the front-to-back ratio (前后比) of a Yagi antenna defined?
- Athe ratio of the main-lobe radiated power to the reverse-direction radiated power
- Bthe ratio of the forward gain to the gain of an ideal point-source antenna
- Cthe ratio of the number of directors to the number of reflectors
- Dthe ratio of the number of directors to the number of driven elements
Front-to-back ratio (前后比) is the ratio of power radiated in the forward main lobe to power radiated in the opposite (back) direction. B describes gain vs isotropic, not F/B; C and D are element-count ratios, unrelated.
US–China difference: US beam specs list F/B (front-to-back) the same way.
Common pitfall: Confusing front-to-back ratio with forward gain or with the director/reflector count.
Real on-air practice: A high F/B keeps local noise from behind the antenna out of your receiver.
行波天线依靠射频电流在长导线组成的连续匹配回路中行进而产生辐射。业余通信常用的行波天线有T2FD和贝伐列奇(Beverage)。与驻波天线相比,行波天线的特点是:
- A没有自然谐振点;对长度要求不严格但通常需接近或大于一个波长
- B对制作尺寸要求严格;没有自然谐振点
- C在较宽频带内具有一系列自然谐振点;对长度要求严格
- D可以依靠天线调谐器实现较宽频带内的匹配;对长度没有严格要求
A traveling-wave antenna radiates as RF current travels along a continuously matched long-wire structure. Common amateur traveling-wave antennas are the T2FD and the Beverage (贝伐列奇). Compared with standing-wave antennas, the characteristic of traveling-wave antennas is:
- Ano natural resonant point; length requirements are not strict but it usually needs to be about or greater than one wavelength
- Bstrict requirements on construction dimensions; no natural resonant point
- Ca series of natural resonant points over a wide band; strict length requirement
- Dcan achieve wideband matching with an antenna tuner; no strict length requirement
Traveling-wave antennas are non-resonant (no natural resonance) and broadband; their length is flexible but should be roughly ≥1 λ for good performance. B is wrong (dimensions are not strict), C describes a resonant antenna, and D misattributes the wideband match to a tuner — traveling-wave antennas are inherently matched by their terminating resistor, not a tuner.
US–China difference: US hams use Beverage (low-band DX receive) and terminated loops the same way.
Common pitfall: Thinking a tuner is what gives a traveling-wave antenna its bandwidth — the termination resistor does.
Real on-air practice: A long Beverage wire receives 160 m DX with little noise and no tuning.
业余无线电通信中常用的行波天线,如T2FD和贝伐列奇(Beverage),其天线终端都接有无感电阻。关于该电阻的作用,正确说法是:
- A天线的电长度达到数个波长时,大部分能量都是边行进边辐射到空间,只有一小部分进入终端电阻耗散掉,以避免因反射而引起驻波
- B该电阻相当于假负载。尽管这实现了宽带操作,却耗散了大部分能量
- C无论天线有多长,输入功率的一半都会耗散在电阻上。这导致发射效率仅为50%
- D考虑大部分行波天线都是谐振天线,则串联电阻可以有效降低天线的有载Q值。这使天线的频率响应展宽,但是发射效率也因此降低
Traveling-wave antennas commonly used in amateur radio, such as the T2FD and the Beverage (贝伐列奇), have a non-inductive resistor at the antenna termination. The correct statement about the function of this resistor is:
- AWhen the electrical length reaches several wavelengths, most of the energy is radiated to space as it travels, and only a small part enters the terminating resistor and is dissipated, avoiding reflection that would cause standing waves
- BThe resistor acts as a dummy load; although it enables broadband operation, it dissipates most of the energy
- CRegardless of length, half the input power is dissipated in the resistor, giving only 50% efficiency
- DSince most traveling-wave antennas are resonant, the series resistor lowers the loaded Q, broadening the response but reducing efficiency
The terminating resistor absorbs the residual traveling wave so it does not reflect back and create standing waves, but in a long antenna most power is already radiated along the way, so only a small fraction is wasted in the resistor. B and C greatly overstate the loss, and D wrongly calls traveling-wave antennas resonant.
US–China difference: US-terminated Beverages likewise show only a few dB loss in the terminator.
Common pitfall: Thinking the end resistor eats half your power — it only cleans up the mismatch.
Real on-air practice: A Beverage’s far end has a 450 Ω resistor to ground; almost all power has already radiated.
小明在一条20米长的导线中点连接一个线圈,并将导线水平提升至稍高于20米的悬挂位置。线圈的另一端接有另一条长度为20米并垂向地面的导线。他将馈线的芯线与垂直导线相连,将馈线的屏蔽层连至地网。这种看似“T”形的天线,极化方式如何?
- A垂直
- B水平
- C垂直与水平分量各半
- D正上方波束是旋转极化的
Xiaoming connects a coil at the midpoint of a 20 m wire and lifts the wire horizontally to a hanging position slightly above 20 m. The other end of the coil connects to another 20 m wire that drops vertically toward the ground. He connects the feed-line center conductor to the vertical wire and the feed-line shield to the ground plane. What is the polarization of this T-shaped antenna?
- Avertical
- Bhorizontal
- Chalf vertical and half horizontal
- Dthe overhead beam is circularly polarized (rotating)
This is a T antenna: the effective radiating section is the vertical down-lead (the horizontal top wire mainly acts as a capacitance hat). The current flows vertically, so the polarization is vertical (垂直). Options B–D are wrong.
US–China difference: The same T antenna is used by US hams for LF/MF vertical polarization.
Common pitfall: Mistaking the large horizontal top wire for the radiating polarity — it is the vertical part that radiates.
Real on-air practice: A T antenna on 160 m gives vertical polarization to match other stations’ verticals.
为了降低辐射仰角,小明试着将T2FD天线的半边振子直立悬挂起来。他将折合振子的馈电端通过匹配变压器连至电缆的芯线,将带有吸收电阻的另一端与地网和电缆的屏蔽层相连。这种天线的极化方式为:
- A垂直
- B水平
- C右旋圆极化
- D左旋圆极化
To lower the radiation elevation angle, Xiaoming hangs half of the T2FD dipole vertically. He connects the folded-dipole feed end via a matching transformer to the cable center conductor, and connects the end with the absorbing resistor to the ground plane and the cable shield. The polarization of this antenna is:
- Avertical
- Bhorizontal
- Cright-hand circular
- Dleft-hand circular
The radiating element here is the vertical half of the T2FD, so the current is vertical and the polarization is vertical (垂直). There is no circular polarization (C, D), and the element is not horizontal (B).
US–China difference: Vertical polarization is the norm for local VHF/UHF ground-wave and for low-band work in both countries.
Common pitfall: Assuming a folded dipole is always horizontal — orientation sets polarization.
Real on-air practice: A vertically hung T2FD gives low-angle vertical polarization good for NVIS/ground wave.
关于环形天线,以下说法正确的是:
- A该天线发射的电磁波,磁场分量垂直于环所在的平面
- B自然谐振的环形天线,半径刚好等于1/4波长
- C这种天线的辐射角很高,仅适合低频段近距离通联
- D在环中串入可变电容可显著抵消感抗,拓展工作带宽
Which of the following statements about a loop antenna is correct?
- AThe electromagnetic wave emitted by this antenna has its magnetic-field component perpendicular to the plane of the loop
- BA naturally resonant loop has a radius exactly equal to 1/4 wavelength
- CThis antenna has a very high radiation angle and is only suitable for short-range low-frequency contacts
- DInserting a variable capacitor in the loop can significantly cancel the inductive reactance and broaden the operating bandwidth
In a loop antenna the radiated magnetic field lies along the loop’s axis, i.e., perpendicular to the plane of the loop, while the electric field lies in the plane of the loop — so A is correct. B is wrong (a self-resonant loop’s circumference is about a wavelength, not radius 1/4 λ); C is not the defining correct fact; D’s bandwidth claim is not the accepted correct statement here.
US–China difference: US magnetic-loop users rely on the same E/H orientation; loops are valued for small footprint.
Common pitfall: Confusing the loop’s null direction (in the loop plane) with its polarization.
Real on-air practice: A small receiving loop is rotated for a null to kill local noise; the H-field points through the loop face.
如果架设天线的空间受限,则磁场耦合可调谐环形天线或许是一种选择。关于这种天线,以下说法正确的是:
- A通过调整激励单元与谐振单元的尺寸,我们可以获得接近1:1的输入SWR
- B谐振单元中的可变电容器应选用耐压较高的,这便于承载更大一些的输入功率
- C谐振单元的尺寸越大,天线的发射效率越高。但是,可调谐的最高频率也越低
- D这种天线对电场不敏感,损失一半的电磁能量,理论增益非常低
If the space for erecting an antenna is limited, a magnetically coupled tunable loop antenna may be an option. Which of the following statements about this antenna is correct? (Choose all that apply.)
- ABy adjusting the sizes of the driven and resonant elements, you can obtain an input SWR close to 1:1
- BThe variable capacitor in the resonant element should be rated for high voltage, so it can handle somewhat higher input power
- CThe larger the resonant element, the higher the radiation efficiency, but the highest tunable frequency is also lower
- DThis antenna is insensitive to the electric field, loses half the electromagnetic energy, and has very low theoretical gain
A magnetically coupled tunable (magnetic) loop can be matched close to 1:1 SWR by sizing its elements (A); the tuning capacitor must withstand the high RF voltage across a small loop, so a high-voltage rating helps power handling (B); and a larger loop radiates more efficiently but tunes only to lower frequencies (C). D is false — the loop is not defined by losing half its energy, and while small it is not that lossy by principle.
US–China difference: US magnetic-loop builders face the same capacitor-voltage and efficiency-vs-size trade-offs.
Common pitfall: Using a low-voltage tuning capacitor that arcs over at higher power.
Real on-air practice: A small indoor mag-loop on 20 m can be tuned 1:1 and work DX at low power.
开展野外通联活动或演练紧急情况下的通信程序时,爱好者们可能会发现,联络100至200千米范围内的HF电台要比联络300至500千米外的更为棘手。好在有很多技术可用来解决这个问题,比较简单的有:
- A尝试使用较低的频段。例如白天40米,夜晚80米
- B使用架设高度较低的水平偶极天线或端馈斜拉天线
- C在偶极天线的下方装反射器,将主瓣调整至正上方
- D使用1米以内外径的高效率磁场耦合谐振环形天线
During field operations or emergency-communication drills, amateurs may find that contacting HF stations 100–200 km away is trickier than contacting those 300–500 km away. Fortunately many techniques help; the simpler ones are: (Choose all that apply.)
- ATry lower bands, e.g., 40 m by day and 80 m by night
- BUse a low-mounted horizontal dipole or an end-fed sloper
- CInstall a reflector below the dipole to direct the main lobe straight up
- DUse a high-efficiency magnetically coupled resonant loop within 1 m diameter
The 100–200 km gap is the skip / dead zone where skywave has not returned but ground wave is weak. NVIS techniques close it: lower bands (A), a low horizontal dipole or sloper that radiates upward (B), and a ground reflector sending the main lobe overhead (C). A tiny 1 m loop (D) is too inefficient on HF to help. So A, B, C are correct.
US–China difference: US emergency and NVIS operators use the same low-dipole + reflector approach for 100–300 km coverage.
Common pitfall: Trying to use a high-angle-free long skip path for short ranges; NVIS needs upward radiation.
Real on-air practice: For a 150 km field-day contact, a low 80 m dipole often works when a beam does not.
收发信机内置的或与收发信机相连的天线调谐器(俗称“天调”)有什么作用?
- A将天馈系统的输入阻抗变换为发射机所需的负载阻抗
- B通过实现共轭匹配,整体提升天馈系统的工作效率
- C允许某个天线在用作发射天线或接收天线时都谐振
- D可根据发射机的当前工作频段自动切换适合的天线
What is the function of a transceiver-built-in or connected antenna tuner (天线调谐器, colloquially 天调)?
- ATransform the input impedance of the antenna-feeder system into the load impedance required by the transmitter
- BBy achieving conjugate matching, improve the overall efficiency of the antenna-feeder system
- CAllow an antenna to resonate whether used for transmitting or receiving
- DAutomatically switch to a suitable antenna according to the transmitter’s current band
An antenna tuner (ATU / 天调) transforms the antenna system’s input impedance to the load impedance the transmitter needs (typically 50 Ω), so the transmitter sees a match and delivers full power. B is wrong — the tuner does not raise the antenna’s own radiation efficiency; C is an incidental effect but A is the precise definition; D describes an antenna switch, not a tuner.
US–China difference: US hams use the same ATU definition; it matches the rig, not the antenna to free space.
Common pitfall: Believing a tuner makes the antenna itself more efficient — it only fixes the match at the transmitter.
Real on-air practice: A tuner lets your 80 m dipole also transmit on 40 m by matching the rig, though feed-line losses remain.
关于天线调谐器(俗称“天调”)可以改善通联效果的说法,以下描述正确的是:
- A天调可以补偿失配天线系统的参数,使发射机输出规定的射频功率
- B天调可以实现天线系统的整体谐振,使天线振子的辐射效率大幅提升
- C天调对失配天线系统的补偿消除了系统内的驻波,传输损耗随之降低
- D天调是将失配天线所反射的能量化热耗散了。通联效果其实更差了
Regarding the claim that an antenna tuner (天调) improves contacts, which of the following descriptions is correct?
- AThe tuner can compensate the parameters of a mismatched antenna system so the transmitter delivers its specified RF power
- BThe tuner achieves overall resonance of the antenna system, greatly raising the element’s radiation efficiency
- CThe tuner’s compensation eliminates the SWR within the system, lowering transmission loss
- DThe tuner dissipates the energy reflected by the mismatched antenna as heat; contacts actually get worse
The tuner lets the transmitter see a matched load and thus deliver its rated RF power (A). It does NOT make the antenna itself resonant or raise its radiation efficiency (B false), nor does it remove SWR on the feed line between tuner and antenna (C false), and it does not primarily dissipate reflected power as heat (D false).
US–China difference: US hams learn the same caveat: a tuner at the rig does not fix a lossy long mismatched feed line.
Common pitfall: Thinking a tuner removes SWR throughout the system — only between tuner and transmitter.
Real on-air practice: Best practice is to place the tuner at the antenna so the feed line stays 50 Ω.
某天线通过50欧馈线与50欧输出阻抗的收发信机相连。现计划在天线电路中串入天线调谐器和通过式驻波功率计来补偿并监测天线的失配情况。理论上的最佳连接顺序为:
- A天线-天线调谐器-驻波功率计-馈线-收发信机
- B天线-馈线-天线调谐器-驻波功率计-收发信机
- C天线-天线调谐器-馈线-驻波功率计-收发信机
- D天线-驻波功率计-天线调谐器-馈线-收发信机
An antenna is connected via a 50 Ω feed line to a 50 Ω-output transceiver. You plan to insert an antenna tuner and a through-line SWR/power meter into the antenna circuit to compensate and monitor the mismatch. The theoretically best connection order is:
- Aantenna – antenna tuner – SWR power meter – feed line – transceiver
- Bantenna – feed line – antenna tuner – SWR power meter – transceiver
- Cantenna – antenna tuner – feed line – SWR power meter – transceiver
- Dantenna – SWR power meter – antenna tuner – feed line – transceiver
To keep the long feed line at 50 Ω and minimize mismatch loss, place the ATU right at the antenna so the mismatched run is as short as possible, then the SWR meter, then the 50 Ω feed line to the rig. Option A does this. B/C/D place the tuner at the shack, leaving a long mismatched feed line.
US–China difference: US antenna lore gives the same advice: tuner at the antenna end for lowest loss.
Common pitfall: Putting the tuner in the shack and assuming the whole system is now lossless.
Real on-air practice: A remote ATU at the tower keeps the coax matched and cool.
塔上某天线通过50欧馈线连至50欧输出阻抗的收发信机。现需要在天线电路中串入天线调谐器ATU和通过式驻波功率计M对天线的匹配情况进行补偿和监测。有四种方案可选:1:ATU和M都在塔顶;2:ATU和M都在塔底;3:ATU在塔底,M在机房;4:ATU和M都在机房。ATU完成调谐时,若按天线系统整体效率从高到低为序,各方案可排列为:
- A方案1最好,方案2、3其次,方案4最差
- B方案4最好,方案2、3其次,方案1最差
- C方案3最好,方案4其次,方案2再其次,方案1最差
- D方案2最好,方案1其次,方案4再其次,方案3最差 [F]LK0938.jpg
A tower-top antenna is connected via 50 Ω feed line to a 50 Ω-output transceiver. You must insert an antenna tuner (ATU) and a through-line SWR power meter (M) to compensate and monitor the match. Four schemes: 1) ATU and M both at the tower top; 2) ATU and M both at the tower base; 3) ATU at tower base, M in the shack; 4) ATU and M both in the shack. Once tuned, ranked from highest to lowest overall antenna-system efficiency, the schemes are:
- AScheme 1 best, schemes 2 and 3 next, scheme 4 worst
- BScheme 4 best, schemes 2 and 3 next, scheme 1 worst
- CScheme 3 best, scheme 4 next, scheme 2 next, scheme 1 worst
- DScheme 2 best, scheme 1 next, scheme 4 next, scheme 3 worst [F]LK0938.jpg
Efficiency is highest when the ATU is at the antenna (tower top, scheme 1), eliminating the mismatched feed-line run; next are schemes with the tuner at the tower base or with the meter in the shack (2, 3); worst is the tuner in the shack (scheme 4) leaving a long mismatched feed line. Option A matches this ranking.
US–China difference: Same efficiency logic; US remote tuners at the antenna are preferred for long runs.
Common pitfall: Ranking by convenience (shack tuner) instead of by feed-line mismatch loss.
Real on-air practice: A long coax with a shack tuner can waste most power as feed-line loss on a bad match.
《中华人民共和国无线电频率划分规定》脚注5.67A说“使用135.7-137.8kHz频段内频率的业余业务台站,其最大有效辐射功率不得超过1瓦(e.i.r.p.)”。其意思为,该频段的业余电台:
- A实际馈送到发射天线的功率不得超过1瓦除以天线的绝对增益比值Gi后得到的功率值
- B发射机标称输出功率不得超过1瓦
- C扣除馈线损耗后实际馈送到发射天线的功率不得超过1瓦
- D扣除馈线和天线的总损耗后天线实际辐射的功率最大不得超过1瓦
Footnote 5.67A of the Radio Frequency Allocation Regulations of the PRC (《中华人民共和国无线电频率划分规定》) says: amateur-service stations using frequencies in 135.7–137.8 kHz shall have a maximum effective isotropically radiated power (EIRP) not exceeding 1 W. This means that amateur stations in this band:
- AThe actual power fed to the transmitting antenna must not exceed the value obtained by dividing 1 W by the antenna’s absolute gain ratio Gi
- BThe transmitter’s rated output power must not exceed 1 W
- CThe power actually fed to the transmitting antenna after deducting feed-line loss must not exceed 1 W
- DThe power actually radiated by the antenna after deducting total feed-line and antenna loss must not exceed 1 W
EIRP (等效全向辐射功率, e.i.r.p.) = power delivered to the antenna × the antenna’s absolute gain Gi. The 1 W limit is on EIRP, so the feed power must satisfy P_feed × Gi ≤ 1 W, i.e., P_feed ≤ 1/Gi — option A. B confuses EIRP with transmitter output; C/D confuse it with radiated power after losses.
US–China difference: The US 136 kHz band has a similar 1 W EIRP limit; the same math applies.
Common pitfall: Treating the 1 W as transmitter output or as actual radiated power rather than EIRP.
Real on-air practice: On 136 kHz a high-gain antenna lets you feed more than 1 W yet stay within the 1 W EIRP cap.
已知某天线的增益为3.85dBd,馈入的功率为10W,其等效全向辐射功率(e.i.r.p)为:
- A40W
- B13.85W
- C38.5W
- D100W
An antenna has a gain of 3.85 dBd and 10 W is fed into it. Its equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) is:
- A40 W
- B13.85 W
- C38.5 W
- D100 W
EIRP = P_in × 10^(G_dBi/10). 3.85 dBd = 3.85 + 2.15 = 6.0 dBi; the linear factor is 10^(6.0/10) = 10^0.6 ≈ 3.98 ≈ 4. So EIRP ≈ 10 W × 4 = 40 W. Option A is correct.
US–China difference: Same EIRP math used by the FCC for Part 97 power limits.
Common pitfall: Forgetting to convert dBd to dBi before computing EIRP (or using 3.85 dB directly gives ~23 W, a distractor).
Real on-air practice: Your license power limit is often expressed as EIRP, so know this conversion.
已知某天线的增益为5.15dBi,馈入的功率为10W,其有效辐射功率(e.r.p)为:
- A20W
- B51.5W
- C10W
- D15.15W
An antenna has a gain of 5.15 dBi and 10 W is fed into it. Its effective radiated power (ERP) is:
- A20 W
- B51.5 W
- C10 W
- D15.15 W
ERP (有效辐射功率, e.r.p.) uses dipole-referenced gain: 5.15 dBi = 5.15 − 2.15 = 3.0 dBd; the linear factor is 10^(3/10) = 2. So ERP = 10 W × 2 = 20 W. Option A is correct. (EIRP would be ~32.7 W, but the question asks for ERP.)
US–China difference: US rules often quote ERP; remember the 2.15 dB dBi/dBd gap.
Common pitfall: Computing EIRP (using dBi directly) when the question asks for ERP.
Real on-air practice: A 5.15 dBi antenna fed 10 W gives 20 W ERP — a useful sanity check.
💬 Have questions about this topic, or FCC / CRAC exam preparation?
对本篇内容或 FCC / CRAC 备考有疑问?
本手册仅供业余无线电爱好者学习交流,题库原题版权归 CRAC(中国无线电协会业余无线电分会)所有,英文翻译由 BG7BAG 编译,转载请注明出处。
☕ 请作者喝杯咖啡 / Buy me a coffee
如果本站对你有帮助,欢迎赞赏支持,谢谢!
If this site helped you, tips are warmly appreciated.

微信赞赏 / WeChat

Ko-fi 赞赏 / Ko-fi